新闻中心

当前位置 > 新闻中心> 电脑办公 > CPU

恶作剧之吻

Ohio begins voting on amendment that would guarantee abortion rights_我的网站

wps

A |     北京时间8月9日,一则关于拉塞尔威斯布鲁克的消息在篮球圈传开。这位36岁的前MVP接受了CNN专访,亲口回应了自己的自由球员处境。当被问及未来去向时,威少直言:“说实话,我不会去想这些问题。我热爱打篮球,如果机会出现,那就顺其自然,这就是我的计划。

B |     Ohio residents this week began voting on a constitutional amendment whose fate will ultimately determine abortion access in the state.Voters are considering two ballot initiatives; ballots began being accepted on Wednesday and go through Election Day on Nov. 7.The two measures are: Issue 1, the amendment that if approved would add abortion rights to the state constitution; and Issue 2, which would legalize recreational marijuana.The proposed abortion amendment would establish an "individual right to one's own reproductive medical treatment including but not limited to abortion" and then creates legal protections for those individuals, among other guarantees like for contraception and fertility treatment.The marijuana measure, if passed, would make Ohio the 24th state to legalize cannabis and would allow adults 21 years and older to buy and possess up to 2.5 ounces of flower and 15 grams of extract.In August, Ohio voters resoundingly rejected a contentious, Republican-backed ballot measure that would have raised the threshold for future changes to the state constitution -- an effort that would have specifically made it more difficult for the abortion amendment to pass.When the U.S. Supreme Court struck down its previous Roe v. Wade ruling, in 2022, the justices returned the question of abortion access to individual states. Since then, while some states have largely ceased abortion access, others have taken up ballot measures that put the question before voters. In those cases -- in both red and blue states so far -- voters have rejected the potential for abortion restrictions and bans or elected to expand access.On Sept. 27, the Ohio Supreme Court started hearing arguments about the state's six-week abortion ban, which was previously put on hold by a lower court.The success or failure of the abortion ballot measure could render that case moot, if state voters add abortion access to their constitution.Both sides have built up mobilization efforts over the past few weeks -- knocking on doors, canvassing and hosting rallies across the state."Whether you're pro-life or pro-choice, Issue 1 just goes too far," Ohio Gov. Mike DeWine, a Republican, said at a recent event at the Ohio GOP's headquarters.Ohio Democrats claimed last week to have been inching toward 100,000 doors knocked and more than 100,000 calls made in the time since their win in the August special election."We're not leaving anything behind as we work to protect women's rights to choose and prevent Ohio's extreme abortion ban from taking effect," Ohio Democratic Chairwoman Elizabeth Walters said during a recent press briefing.There's also been significant financial investment in the race. According to numbers from AdImpact released last week, $12.3 million had been spent or reserved in advertising around the abortion ballot measure, with anti-amendment groups outspending amendment supporters by about $1.6 million.

The two sides make their arguments

Both Ohioans United for Reproductive Rights, a coalition of groups supporting abortion rights, and allied Ohio Democrats have sounded the alarm on what they claim to be foul play by opponents of the abortion amendment.Last month, the state Supreme Court allowed the Republican-controlled Ohio Ballot Board -- which is overseen by Secretary of State Frank LaRose, who is also running for the U.S. Senate -- to use amendment language that includes the phrase "unborn child."Democrats on the board had asked for measure's language to remain what was on the petition that voters originally signed, which did not include that term.Amendment supporters have argued it was rewritten to confuse voters and is misleading about what the measure would actually do."They're running scared because they know their extreme abortion ban is wildly unpopular, and Ohio voters support a woman's right to make medical decisions for themselves without interference from politicians," Walters, with the state Democrats, said during a recent press call.Abortion opponents have also attempted to broaden the stakes of the proposal, arguing that it "goes far beyond" codifying the protections of Roe v. Wade to potentially affect parents' rights and "threaten the freedom of conscience of Ohio's healthcare professionals and preclude ... the enactment and enforcement of commonsense, protective laws," as Protect Women Ohio, one of the leading organizations fighting against the amendment, wrote in a memo."The Abortion Amendment victimizes rather than protects and empowers women and girls," they continued.LaRose, a leading voice against the measure, said in a statement to ABC News that "as a father and someone who's always stood up to protect life, I'll be working to defeat this radical measure."。”这番话与他去年休赛期的淡定如出一辙,当时他也是等到训练营临近才与国王敲定合同。         威少的态度很明确:钱不是问题。

C | 据透露,他不在乎合同金额,哪怕不给钱也行。他想要的只是上场打球的机会,大约25分钟的出场时间,当然,还得有球在手。这种“不为钱打球”的姿态,放在一个生涯总薪资超过3亿美元的巨星身上,显得既洒脱又令人唏嘘。         但现实是残酷的。上赛季威少为国王出战76场,场均15.2分、6.7次助攻、5.4个篮板,三分命中率33.8%创下生涯第二好成绩。国王总经理斯科特佩里也承认,威少的表现“远超底薪合同的价值”。然而国王目前只有底薪空间,且希望他在新秀达柳斯阿卡夫身后扮演更小的导师角色。威少拒绝了,他拒绝的不是钱,而是“拿一分钱干一分活”的妥协。他不是为挣一份合同留在联盟,而是为了燃烧剩余的全部价值继续打球。         这就是威少如今的困境,他愿意改变,愿意接受底薪,但不愿意改变打法。

D | 联盟30支球队的高管心里清楚:威少一上场,球场局势就可能“失控”。36岁的年纪、需要持球的打法、不稳定的投射,这些标签叠加在一起,让这位曾经的MVP在这个夏天乏人问津。有消息称,欧洲联赛开出400-500万欧元的报价,威少没去。他甚至可能面临零合同进入2026-27赛季的局面。         但威少没有退役的打算,他在采访中透露,希望能尽量多打几年,甚至期待打到2028年。这份心气令人动容,一个拿了MVP、进了9次全明星、赚了数亿美元的球员,本可以体面退场,却仍愿为一份底薪、一个名额而苦苦等待。他或许不再是那个飞天遁地的“神龟”,但那份对篮球的执着,从未改变。         接下来的路怎么走? 国王仍可能是唯一的选项,但前提是威少接受“导师”定位。或者,像有些人猜测的那样,CBA会不会成为这位史上最大牌外援的下一站?无论如何,威少已经表态:只要哪里需要他,他就去哪里。这份坦然,这份热爱,值得一份尊重。

Current article:http://cw4b.banhuannunuluchuaiguangenru.sbs/news/20260826_300449.html

Published on:07:56:01


文章观点支持

文章价值打分
当前文章打分0 分,共有0人打分
热门评论
热门文章